Click Here to Get Started

advertisement
Click Here to Learn More
advertisement
Click Here to Get Started

LaShawn A. v. Williams: District of Columbia

  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
You may use the stars on the left to rate and leave feedback for the current article. No registration is required. Waiting for 5 votes 0.0 of 5 stars (0 votes) — Thanks for your vote

Please fill out the following optional information before submitting your rating:



Staggering caseloads, lack of services, overcrowded foster homes, and almost no adoptions were all evidence of the failures plaguing the D.C. child welfare system, which was then part of the Department of Human Services (DHS), when Children's Rights became involved in reforming the system. Once children entered the foster care system, they were unlikely to leave until they were old enough to be on their own.

advertisement
 

In June 1989, Children's Rights initiated a massive reform effort by filing a class-action suit in federal court alleging DHS's failure to comply with the federal Child Welfare and Adoption Assistance Act, the U.S. Constitution, and various local statutes. In 1991, after a full trial on the issues in which Children's Rights presented overwhelming proof that the district had harmed children in its custody, District Court Judge Thomas Hogan issued a 102-page opinion declaring his "inescapable conclusion" that DHS had violated the plaintiff children's rights. Unfortunately, DHS made only minimal progress between 1991 and 1995, prompting the court to impose the drastic remedy of a receivership on DHS. That decision marked the first time in history that a child welfare system was placed under full receivership by a court because of its non-compliance with court-ordered reforms. In 2000 the new administration of Mayor Anthony Williams expressed that the District would change and be committed to reform if it regained control of the system. Among other plans, the District expressed commitment to form a new cabinet-level Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA).

In light of these commitments, the court terminated receivership in 2001 while putting the District on probation. The probation period ended in January 2003. Children's Rights and the Court Monitor will continue to watch CFSA's progress very carefully to ensure that the current administration stays its course of progress.

Unplanned Pregnancy?
California
Click here to visit Unique Adoptions, Inc.
Unique Adoptions has been working with women for over 17 years. We provide all different types of adoption options. Whether you are seeking a closed or an extremely open adoption, we are here to help.
Unique Adoptions, Inc.
(888) 637-8200   Fax (951) 677-9098
advertisement
Sponsored Links
Parent Profiles
Winnie the Pooh...Winnie the Pooh...silly ole bear. We can't wait to read stories to our kids! Are you the one who will help us with our dream of starting a family? We think of... [more]

[about us]  [contact us]  [waiting couples near MI]  [all]

Adoption Tips
Talk to others who have already begun or completed their own adoption searches. They can help you figure out which methods of searching would be the most relevant and appropriate for your specific situation.
Adoption Photolisting
Michelle (CA / 17 / F)
Michelle is an adventurous, engaging, and talkative teen. Like most teens her age, she enjoys talking with friends and keeping each others' secrets. Michelle has a very outgoing... [more]

[about me]   [search]   [waiting kids in CA]   [all]   [share]

Adoption E-Magazine
Help
Feedback
Template Settings
Width: 1024     1280
Choose a Location:
Choose a Theme: